×
نام و نام خانوادگی
بازخوانی ...
اطلاعات کتابشناختی
عنوان اصلی: رسيدگي‌هاي بدون كيفرخواست در حقوق ايران و انگلستان
پدیدآورندگان : اميرحسين بحيرايي (پديدآور)
دانشگاه امام صادق(ع) (پديدآور)
معارف اسلامي و حقوق (پديدآور)
نوع : متن
جنس : مقاله
catalog
چاپ
صاحب محتوا :

دانشگاه امام صادق

توصیفگر : Non-indictable offences
speed at trial
دادگاه صلح
رسيدگي بدون كيفر خواست
Magistrate court
direct litigation
سرعت در رسيدگي
دادرسي اختصاري
summary Proceedings
طرح مستقيم دعوا در دادگاه
وضعیت نشر : تهران : : دانشگاه امام صادق(ع).دانشكده معارف اسلامي و حقوق ، ، ۱۳۹۷
مشخصات فیزیکی : ۱۳۵ ص.
خلاصه : A summary or non-indictable process in the UK legal system has been adopted to speed up the criminal procedure of petty offences in magistrate courts. In this type of proceeding, which involves close to 95% of the proceedings procedures, such as the jury, are removed and the process is handled by lay mans without salary. All of these crimes are handled by the magistrate court. In United Kingdom, non-indictable process include summary offenses and either way offences in the context of proceedings by magistrate court. These crimes are petty crimes and sever crimes are handled by the jury in crown courtThere are some examples of no-indictable in Iran's law. These include seventh and eightth degree offenses, chastity offenses, juvenile offenses, prosecution by the court, offenses committed by the president, some crimes committed by clerics, paying diyah in specific cases, handling certain crimes within the jurisdiction of the district court, Dispute Resolution Council and Government Organization.In Iran's law, cases in which the trial begin in the court are the most problematic examples of criminal proceedings without indictment to the extent that between 1373 until 1381, when this method was pursued in the judiciary, was one of the blackest criminal proceedings in the country he ate. Although in this way, the purpose of the trial is to increase the speed of the trial, but a judicial authority carries out the proceedings from the beginning to the end of the proceedings, and thus the most important principles of the proceedings, including the distinction between the judicial authorities, the distinction between the prosecuting authority and the impartiality of the judicial and judicial authorities are violated.These problems in Iran's law about the distinction between court officials in cases of direct litigation in court have been solved in uk at the time that the investigation and prosecution was carried out by the police, which led to the new laws. The investigating and prosecution authority is separated from each other. The prosecution is currently being pursued by the cps and investigation by the police, and they are completely independent from each otherIn cases of direct litigation, the prosecutor does not intervene and can only be present at the hearing. In this case, the prosecution, investigation and proceeding is conducted by the judge of the court. In these cases, if there is no plaintiff and there is general benefit for proccess, the judge himself should have a claim. So the main problem is that, in this case, the prosecutor has been removed from the process and no alternative has been set for him.Another problem to this approach in Iran's law is that this method in British law is specific to petty crimes, but in Iran's law, there are some cases in major crimes such as cases which have the punishment of death penalty. In this thesis, attempts have been made to investigate the cases and procedures for a trial without indictment in Iranian and British law.
یادداشت :
/ امیرحسین بحیرایی
چكيده ها: فارسي - عربي - انگليسي
شناسه : 408838
تاریخ ایجاد رکورد : 1397/9/13
قیمت شيء دیجیتال : رایگان


* محتوای این صفحه توسط کارشناسان این درگاه ویرایش نشده است. لطفا در صورت مشاهده ایراد در محتوا از این طریق اطلاع رسانی کنید.

دیدگاه شما

تست
ورود به درگاه کنسرسیوم
Loding



رمز عبور خود را فراموش کرده ام.
چنانچه تا کنون عضو سایت نشده اید ثبت نام کنید.
درباره کنسرسیوم
ما مجموعه‌ای از كتابخانه‌ها و سازمان‌های دارای منابع اطلاعاتی (کتاب، نشریه، نسخه‌های خطی، عکس، صدا، فیلم و... ) هستیم که با هدف تامین نیازهای پژوهشگران و شهروندان ایرانی برای دسترسی هر چه سریع‌تر به محتوای مورد نظر خود، کنسرسیوم محتوای ملی را تشکیل داده‌ایم. برای رسیدن به این هدف، قصد داریم با بسترسازی مناسب و جلب مشارکت دیگر تولید کنندگان محتوا به گرد آوری، تبدیل، سازماندهی و حفاظت اطلاعات به شکل رقومی و در سطح ملی، بپردازیم.